POV-Ray 3.73 beta 23 Ray Tracing Performance
.jpg "intel core i5 2400 (3.10 ghz)")
Compared to the proposed similarly priced Core i5 760, the i5 2400 would be 29.5% faster. Clock for clock we see a 15.6% improvement over Lynnfield (4C/4T vs. Sandy Bridge's FP performance is very good. I didn’t have the opportunity to test the i5 2400 with HT enabled in this test so I measured performance of the i7 880 with HT enabled/disabled to compare per-thread performance. I also ran a few numbers using Cinebench R11.5. In the multithreaded test Sandy Bridge’s per-core performance is even better than Lynnfield with HT enabled. The retail 3.1GHz chip should turbo up to 3.4GHz in this test, giving it a 9.6% frequency boost. Compared to a similarly positioned Lynnfield, Sandy Bridge is about 20% faster. Compared to a similarly clocked Lynnfield, Sandy Bridge can deliver 11% better performance. Whatever Intel has done to Sandy Bridge's FP is big.Ĭreated by the Cinema 4D folks we have Cinebench, a popular 3D rendering benchmark that gives us both single and multi-threaded 3D rendering results.Ĭinebench was particularly surprising because it gives us a good opportunity to look at single threaded FP performance. With Hyper Threading enabled, the Core i5 2400 is actually dangerously close to the 6-core 980X. Compared to the i5 760 it’s 20.5% faster. This is another one of those situations where the Core i5 2400 without Hyper Threading is able to perform on par with the Core i7 880 with Hyper Threading. The results reported are the rendering composite scores:
To look at performance under 3dsmax we ran the SPECapc 3dsmax 8 benchmark (only the CPU rendering tests) under 3dsmax 9 SP1.
INTEL CORE I5 2400 (3.10 GHZ) PROFESSIONAL
Today's desktop processors are more than fast enough to do professional level 3D rendering at home. 3dsmax 9 - SPECapc 3dsmax CPU Rendering Test
0 kommentar(er)
